Hi Stefan,
> Hi,
>
> I got a reaction from Andy Polyakov (one of the openssl lead developers)
> regarding my suggested patch to make OpenSSL compile with mingw-w64,
> that I wanted to pass on:
>
> I wrote:
> > > Apart from adding a line to configure, I needed a slight
modification
> >
Hi,
I got a reaction from Andy Polyakov (one of the openssl lead developers)
regarding my suggested patch to make OpenSSL compile with mingw-w64,
that I wanted to pass on:
I wrote:
> > Apart from adding a line to configure, I needed a slight modification
> > to apps/speed.c and engines/e
On 6/3/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In reply to various mails, let me add some comments:
>
> > > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use
> > > .exe
> > > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that
> > > you
Hi Stefan,
>Hi,
>
> I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple
> of changes to the source code (see attached patch).
>
> Some notes:
> - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to
Hi Stefan, FX,
> > - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use
> > .exe
> > extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that
> > you currently need to "Configure mingw64 no-asm no-hw".
>
> IIUC, the current position on naming is that mingw64 should
> - I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use
> .exe
> extension for compiling. Nothing surprising here, I think. Note that
> you currently need to "Configure mingw64 no-asm no-hw".
IIUC, the current position on naming is that mingw64 shouldn't be
used, but rather th
Hi,
I just tried to compile OpenSSL-0.9.8h with mingw-w64 (see
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/) and needed a couple
of changes to the source code (see attached patch).
Some notes:
- I added a "mingw64" line to Configure and (think I) told it to use
.exe
extension for c
