;
"mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net"
*Sent:* Monday, June 6, 2016 2:30 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
I for one am grateful for the configure script. I’m sure I’m not alone.
Ruben
Van: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Verzonden: maandag 6 juni 2016 21:49
Aan: mi
I for one am grateful for the configure script. I’m sure I’m not alone.
Ruben
Van: Jean-Baptiste Kempf
Verzonden: maandag 6 juni 2016 21:49
Aan: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
On 06 Jun, Ozkan Sezer wrote :
> Not everyone would h
On 06 Jun, Ozkan Sezer wrote :
> Not everyone would have the required autofoo installed on their
> systems to generate the configury. To me, it is polite to have the
> generated files as they are intended to be in the repo.
If you don't have autotools, then why are you compiling mingw64? If you
ar
p/gcc
---
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2016-06-07
-
发件人：Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
发送日期：2016-06-07 00:37
收件人：mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
抄送：
主题：[Mingw-w64-public] Autotools & git
Hi,
I'm wondering about the rational
On 6/6/16, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering about the rational for having all autotools generated
> files commited to the git repository.
> Is there a specific reason for that? Or would it be OK to provide a
> patch that adds a bootstrap script for all project & removes the said
Hi,
I'm wondering about the rational for having all autotools generated
files commited to the git repository.
Is there a specific reason for that? Or would it be OK to provide a
patch that adds a bootstrap script for all project & removes the said
generated files?
Regards,
---
