On 7/31/2014 17:16, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> This commit broken the gcc 4.9 building:
>
> $ make
> make all-am
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/cauchy/obj/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.9/mingw-w64-crt'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `secapi/memmove_s.c', needed by
> `secapi/lib64_libmsvcrt
This commit broken the gcc 4.9 building:
$ make
make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/cauchy/obj/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.9/mingw-w64-crt'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `secapi/memmove_s.c', needed by
`secapi/lib64_libmsvcrt_a-memmove_s.o'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/
On 7/29/2014 04:04, Ruben De Smet wrote:
> Some applications, like CryptoPP, won't run on Windows XP, because
> memmove_s isn't defined in that OS. As I needed CryptoPP to compile
> easily, I wrote this patch. It emulates the method by checking for the
> availability and falling back on memmove (wi
Some applications, like CryptoPP, won't run on Windows XP, because
memmove_s isn't defined in that OS. As I needed CryptoPP to compile
easily, I wrote this patch. It emulates the method by checking for the
availability and falling back on memmove (without s).
I mimicked memcpy_s.
I'm not subscrib
