OK, pushed for you.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Martell Malone wrote:
> Hi Kai,
>
> I don't think this was applied to trunk.
> On the list the messages from this look deleted ?
>
> I get a message saying
> "There are no messages in this thread."
> on the public archive
>
> Regards
> Martell
Hi Kai,
I don't think this was applied to trunk.
On the list the messages from this look deleted ?
I get a message saying
"There are no messages in this thread."
on the public archive
Regards
Martell
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Looks good to me. Please apply to trunk.
Looks good to me. Please apply to trunk.
Regards,
Kai
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/m
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Martell Malone wrote:
> Here is a patch to move rand_r from pthread.h to stdlib.h
> Typical POSIX programs expect this to be in stdlib
>
> Very similar to the previously applied patches in moving localtime_r.
> Using the same guards to try best to ensure legacy supp
Here is a patch to move rand_r from pthread.h to stdlib.h
Typical POSIX programs expect this to be in stdlib
Very similar to the previously applied patches in moving localtime_r.
Using the same guards to try best to ensure legacy support with
win32-pthreads.
Comments and suggestions are welcome
