On 14/05/15 08:03, Steve Lhomme wrote:
> In general I find the whole process awkward. Wine should only add IDL
> definitions when the classes are supported.
That's not true, it's fine to add declarations for not supported APIs to
Wine. It's just the first step to support them.
Jacek
---
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the same applies as for the other patch. Just one comment I see about
> this idl-file (it isn't necessary to attach generated header to
> patch). It seems to me that a lot of stuff is missing here. On quick
> research I miss a lot of
Hi,
the same applies as for the other patch. Just one comment I see about
this idl-file (it isn't necessary to attach generated header to
patch). It seems to me that a lot of stuff is missing here. On quick
research I miss a lot of required interfaces, and some types.
Anyway, let us way for Wi
---
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.am| 1 +
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.in| 1 +
mingw-w64-headers/direct-x/include/dxgidebug.idl | 44
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 mingw-w64-headers/direct-x/include/dxgidebug.i
