> On Aug 31, 2021, at 17:10, Patrick Northon wrote:
>
> Is this patch better? In the case of the new if statement, should I indent it
> on a different level than the block it enclose? Do you adjust it before
> applying?
Oh, I’m terribly sorry - I didn’t notice the fact that it was a regular
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 22:57, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 31, 2021, at 17:10, Patrick Northon wrote:
>>
>> Is this patch better? In the case of the new if statement, should I indent
>> it on a different level than the block it enclose? Do you adjust it before
>> applying?
>
>
> Oh,
Is this patch better? In the case of the new if statement, should I
indent it on a different level than the block it enclose? Do you adjust
it before applying? Speaking of, I noticed that some parts of that file
is indented with tabs.
On 2021-08-31 07 h 59, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Hi,
On Sat,
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Patrick Northon via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
As requested, and after further digging and testing, here's a patch that fix a
few problems that I have found with long double formatting in hexadecimal. I
have more coming for doubles in a much revised form.
It fixes:
- Wron
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021, Patrick Northon via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
I apologize, I'm wrestling with my mail client. Here's the c file, but not as
an attachment. Does the mailing list block .c files?
Thanks for the testcase! Yes I think this mailing list blocks a lot of
file extensions - I think
I apologize, I'm wrestling with my mail client. Here's the c file, but not as
an attachment. Does the mailing list block .c files?
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
puts( " --- Long doubles ---\n");
char buf[100];
snprintf(buf, siz
Here the c test file. I can see it was attached in my sent folder, but it's
not there on the maillist?
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
As requested, and after further digging and testing, here's a patch that fix a
few problems that I have found with long double formatting in hexadecimal. I
have more coming for doubles in a much revised form.
It fixes:
- Wrong exponent was set for denormalized long doubles.
- It remove normaliza
