> thank you very much for the additional info.. Yes, you are wright, I did this
> just because I wanted to see that the compiler works. My real application
> will require arguments anyway.
> Thanks a lot for your help.
No problem, glad i could help you.
Have fun!
Pierre.
--
Please post to the mailing list, if you only post to me and i answer you with a
misstake, no one will be able to correct me :)
> thank you very much for your quick response. I just tried with a "viod"
> instead and it works fine now.
You shouldn't use void as your main arguments for two reasons:
