Can someone please send me the unsubscribe url for this email list?
mingw-users
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:02:43 -0700
From: gopal_ven...@yahoo.com
To: mingw-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Mingw-users] How best to create
>> From: Charles Wilson
This is possible, but of course this is up to mingw.org's maintainer,
if they want to add it.
>> From: Charles Wilson
>> I think it is a good idea; the BSD-vs-LGPL license is a good argument in
>> winpthread's favor (also, pthreads-w32 has seen relatively few
Op 20 sep. 2011 00:58 schreef "JonY" het
volgende:
>
> On 9/20/2011 05:05, Venu Gopal wrote:
> >
> >
> > If you're willing to use mingw-w64, I believe that std::thread *is*
supported on windows.
> >>> There are *experimental* GCC 4.7 and 4.6 builds available, but for now
only linking with "-s
On 9/20/2011 05:05, Venu Gopal wrote:
>
>
> If you're willing to use mingw-w64, I believe that std::thread *is*
> supported on windows.
>>> There are *experimental* GCC 4.7 and 4.6 builds available, but for now only
>>> linking with "-static" works.
>
>>> GCC 4.6:
>>> http://code.goo
2011/9/19 K. Frank
> Hi Ruben!
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > 2011/9/19 K. Frank
> >> ...
> >> I'm certainly not trying to put you on the spot
> >> with exaggerated claims. (And for everyone's information, Ruben will
> >> be releasing a c++22-compliant person
Hi Ruben!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2011/9/19 K. Frank
>> ...
>> I'm certainly not trying to put you on the spot
>> with exaggerated claims. (And for everyone's information, Ruben will
>> be releasing a c++22-compliant personal build next week.)
>
> I'm sure you
2011/9/19 K. Frank
> Hi Ruben!
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
> > Op 19 sep. 2011 01:08 schreef "K. Frank" het
> volgende:
> > ...
> > There are *experimental* GCC 4.7 and 4.6 builds available, but for now
> only
> > linking with "-static" works.
> >
> > GCC 4.6:
Hi Ruben!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Op 19 sep. 2011 01:08 schreef "K. Frank" het volgende:
> ...
> There are *experimental* GCC 4.7 and 4.6 builds available, but for now only
> linking with "-static" works.
>
> GCC 4.6:
> http://code.google.com/p/pcxprj/downloads/
Op 19 sep. 2011 01:08 schreef "K. Frank" het
volgende:
>
> Hello Venu!
>
> I have taken the liberty of copying this post to the mingw-w64 list,
> as it's relevant there, as well.
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:18 PM, veegee wrote:
> >
> > Hi K. Frank:
> >
> >>> To follow up on an earlier suggestio
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 8:22 PM, veegee wrote:
>
> Hi K. Frank:
>
>>> I have taken the liberty of copying this post to the mingw-w64 list,
>>> as it's relevant there, as well.
>
> No Problem. Honestly, I am not familiar with mingw-w64 project and the
> relation between
> mingw and mingw-w64. At
Hello Venu!
I have taken the liberty of copying this post to the mingw-w64 list,
as it's relevant there, as well.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:18 PM, veegee wrote:
>
> Hi K. Frank:
>
>>> To follow up on an earlier suggestion in this thread: Why not use the
>>> standard
>>> std::thread facilities o
11 matches
Mail list logo
