On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Earnie Boyd
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM, dashesy wrote:
>> BTW, this is the line in Wikipedia "64-bit Windows has switched to
>> using position-independent code for DLLs as well and has abandoned
>> relocation"
>
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/8/8 dashesy :
>> Reading the Wikipedia page
>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position-independent_code) , it seems
>> Windows supports PIC on x64,
>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>> I was wonderi
rebaseall at least on x64 platform and avoid the fork
failures.
Thanks
dashesy
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
> wrote:
>> The following article has the most info I have found:
>>
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa905330.aspx
>>
>> It includes:
>>
>> Before a 32 bit process is created, the following attributes are
>> checked to determine whet
t;> to represent things like 1/128 exactly, use binary.
>>
>> (In practice, for the same word size, binary is somewhat more
>> accurate, because in decimal a single decimal digit is usually
>> stored in four bits, wasting the difference between a decimal
>> digit and
