Re: [Mingw-w64-public] x64 MSVC import librries

Thanks! Sorry for the wrong mailing list, but looks like things worked out in the end :) Are there any mingw builders, who track the master branch in binutils? Vadim On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2015-03-18 17:19 GMT+01:00 Ruben Van Boxem : > > 2015-03-18 16:

[Mingw-w64-public] x64 MSVC import librries

Hi, I think I am bumping into the issue described here: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16598. The bug also has a patch attached. What would it take to get someone to merge it? Vadim -- Dive into the

[Mingw-w64-public] Link-time dead code elimination

Hi, Is link-time dead code elimination via --function-sections + -Wl,--gc-sections known to work on mingw? -- Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Busine

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

p time of my test example by 40%. Thanks! Vadim On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:53 PM, dw wrote: > > > Ups, that was unintended to send an empty mail :) > > I did wonder. I assumed it was just a ping. > > > So, here is a patch. > > Your patch does not look right. You

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

No, sorry, I don't have the setup to build mingw. Not likely that I will have time to do it any time soon either. I meant this as a bug report. I hope the problem has been investigated sufficiently for mingw devs to act on it. Vadim On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:34 PM, dw wrote: >

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

VirtualProtect() per relocation entry. I am not entirely sure how this situation comes about, but here you go... On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Vadim Chugunov wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to figure out the cause of a slow application startup, and the > evidence I have so far, points t

[Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

ility (?). Unfortunately, I don't see any headers included by pseudo-reloc.c that would define this symbol. And, indeed, the behavior I am seeing at runtime indicates that if was not defined... Am I reading this right? Thanks! Vadim (mingw version = i686-4.9.0-win32-dwarf-

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libwinpthreads mutexes

is issue: https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/344. thanks, Vadim On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:49 AM, John E. / TDM wrote: > On 9/13/2013 1:28 AM, Adrien Nader wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013, John E. / TDM wrote: > >> This is absolutely the case. The pthreads-win32

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libwinpthreads mutexes

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:59 PM, John E. / TDM wrote: > On 9/12/2013 12:50 PM, K. Frank wrote: > > Hi Vadim! > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Vadim <> wrote: > *snip* > >> Before we embark on that, I'd like to clarify a couple more things: &g

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libwinpthreads mutexes

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:32 AM, K. Frank wrote: > Hello Kai and Vadim! > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Kai Tietz <> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2013/9/12 Vadim <>: > >> Hi, > >> I am investigating performance problems in binary compiled

[Mingw-w64-public] libwinpthreads mutexes

used instead? Vadim -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-