On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2013/11/18 Tristan Gingold :
>> Hello,
>>
>> at least in ntdll.dll from Windows x64 2013, some UNWIND_INFO
>> records are using version 2.
>> But unfortunately, I wasn't able to get any documentation a
On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> I've taken a look to ntdll.dll file on Windows 7, and couldn't find
> there such a UNWIND_INFO block. Have you cross-checked this with
> objdump's capability to dump information? It might be that objdump
> doesn't verify for version-number, so w
On Nov 18, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2013/11/18 Tristan Gingold :
>> Hello,
>>
>> at least in ntdll.dll from Windows x64 2013, some UNWIND_INFO
>> records are using version 2.
>> But unfortunately, I wasn't able to get any documentation a
Hello,
at least in ntdll.dll from Windows x64 2013, some UNWIND_INFO
records are using version 2.
But unfortunately, I wasn't able to get any documentation about
it.
That's a little bit worrying, as gdb is reading these tables
in order to compute the backtrace. When it finds version 2
records, i
On Jul 27, 2012, at 9:10 AM, niXman wrote:
> 2012/7/27 NightStrike:
>>
>> You might want to check out gcc 4.7.2 with current trunk mingw-w64
>> crt/headers. I believe SEH is in as of the 4th of July.
>
> Are you saying that this code will be execute correctly?
>
> try {
> int* i = 0;
> co
On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 7/4/12, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2012/7/4 Tristan Gingold :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> as you patch was applied to gcc's repository will you sent an updated
>>>> version of your patch for setjmp.h head
Hi,
> as you patch was applied to gcc's repository will you sent an updated
> version of your patch for setjmp.h header?
Sure. I was writing a mail about that, but you were faster.
> Do you think we should use for older gcc-versions - not having the
> fixed frame-pointer builtin - still __mingw
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:31 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
[...]
>> I think I now know how to compute the establisher frame value. This is
>> simply what is advertised by Frame Reg and Frame Offset in UNWIND_INFO. The
>&
On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2012/6/8 Tristan Gingold :
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Tristan,
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this. The patch is ok. As JonY said, unified
>>> diffs a
On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello Tristan,
>
> Thanks for working on this. The patch is ok. As JonY said, unified
> diffs are more welcome ;)
>
>
> 2012/6/8 Tristan Gingold :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently working on porting o
On Jun 8, 2012, at 1:55 PM, JonY wrote:
> On 6/8/2012 18:27, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently working on porting our toolset to gcc 4.7 compiled to fully
>> support SEH, and I have compiled gdb. This gdb crashes frequently, and I
>> traced
Hi,
I am currently working on porting our toolset to gcc 4.7 compiled to fully
support SEH, and I have compiled gdb. This gdb crashes frequently, and I
traced that to the use of setjmp/longjmp.
When compiled with SEH enabled, mingw64 makes longjmp use RtlUnwinEx, and to
achieve that it calls
12 matches
Mail list logo
