Jacek, it doesn't look like this was pushed, or at least I don't see
the change in https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/mingw-w64/ci/v5.x/tree/.
Could you verify?
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world'
Jacek, could you backport this patch to v5.x? It applies cleanly with
`git cherry-pick 6ec4fb2d8c1b1abfd5aca69c382c24feb6961342`.
Thank you.
Tamir
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Looks like my attachment did not come come through?
>
> Here it is as a gist
ave any insight as to why `-Wl` is apparently not
respected under mingw-w64?
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been attempting to cross-compile CockroachDB to Windows using
> mingw-w64. The compilation strategy used for CockroachDB invo
Hello!
I've been attempting to cross-compile CockroachDB to Windows using
mingw-w64. The compilation strategy used for CockroachDB involves
producing static archives with missing symbols (this is due to how
golang's tooling compiles c/c++ code).
In our linux builds, we pass `-Wl,--unresolved-symb
Looks like my attachment did not come come through?
Here it is as a gist:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tamird/75365627ac99e5714133444d3625e8fc/raw/4a703a8599e813a1058916f1977d794040ea0ed4/secure_overloads.patch
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Hi Ja
Hi Jacek, apologies for the delay (I didn't receive your reply).
I've attached the patch as an attachment.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5dae5d43.aspx
>
> Fixes https://sourceforge.net/p
See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5dae5d43.aspx
Fixes https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/535.
---
diff --git mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h
mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h
index 7d36d91..114cfd7 100644
--- mingw-w64-headers/crt/sec_api/string_s.h
+++ mingw-w64
