On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Liu Hao wrote:
> On 2017/10/24 23:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 23 October 2017 at 15:55, David Gressett wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>> If that code still doesn't build we need a bug report.
>
> The attached program would not compile if the first line were uncommented
d ARM support, we
realized there were gaps in our X86 code, so we back-fitted the
change, which brought us to this point.
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> My apologies for this question. I don't have a test rig setup with
> MinGW. I'
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:06 AM, lhmouse wrote:
> SSE2 is mandatory on x64.
Yes, agreed. However, SSE2+ also requires OS support. The OS is
responsible for saving state via XSAVE.
Its possible to have SSE2+ processor and non-capable OS combination.
When the OS is not capable, a SIGILL is generat
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:30 AM, LRN wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01.08.2016 11:25, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
>> My question is, does MinGW support Signals and sigset_t ?
>
> No.
>
>> Or does MinGQW use SEH and try/except/fin
Hi Everyone,
My apologies for this question. I don't have a test rig setup with
MinGW. I'm finding hits online when searching the compile error, but I
did not find a canonical answer from the MinGW folks.
We have a user reporting:
C:/msys64/home/.../cpu.cpp:107:28: error: 'sigset_t' was not
