On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jim Michaels wrote:
> the point is, I shouldn't have to modify the code. it should be done with
> compiler switches.
> unless your method of "packing" is compiler independent.
>
> the compiler shouldn't balk when I throw the -fpack-struct switch. so why
> did th
> may bite. Unless libstdc++ basic_string class is marked as dllimport,
> _S_empty_rep is effectively hidden and different modules will have
> different addresses for _S_empty_rep.
> This can be fised by compiling libstdc++
>
This can be fixed by compiling libstdc++ with --enable-fully-dynam
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:25 AM, JonY wrote:
> On 9/8/2010 23:34, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>> Please excuse my ignorance, I just read the subject and not the details
>> but I would like to note that throwing/catching exceptions between DSO's
>> (dynamically linked objects) can be very tricky with gc