[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 2/2] dwmapi.h: Use DWMAPI in function declarations

2024-09-05 Thread Daniel Verkamp
HRESULT. Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp --- mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h | 62 +++--- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h index 8a8db7b94..23e375917 100644 --- a/mingw

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/2] dwmapi.h: Add explicit DwmFlush void param

2024-09-05 Thread Daniel Verkamp
The DwmFlush() function takes zero parameters, not an undefined number of parameters. Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp --- mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwmapi.h

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ASLR/--dynamicbase and -pie with MinGW-w64

2013-07-14 Thread Daniel Verkamp
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:13 PM, JonY wrote: > On 6/9/2013 08:09, Daniel Verkamp wrote: >> >> So, this leads us to a list of questions: >> >> Why does --dynamicbase not enable generation of .reloc? >> Barring that, is the -pie option the correct way to force gener

[Mingw-w64-public] ASLR/--dynamicbase and -pie with MinGW-w64

2013-06-08 Thread Daniel Verkamp
ated at offset 0x1000 in the test executable. So, this leads us to a list of questions: Why does --dynamicbase not enable generation of .reloc? Barring that, is the -pie option the correct way to force generation of .reloc for .exe files? If so, why doe

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Inline asm problem...

2010-02-04 Thread Daniel Verkamp
t */ >        :"%rax", "%rdx"          /* clobbered registers */ >       ); >   return d; > }/* method mulmod64_asm */ I don't have a 64-bit machine handy to test this at the moment, but it could at least be more efficiently written with diff