On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Earnie wrote:
> Chiheng Xu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Chiheng Xu
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Is 64-bits MSYS or Cygwin necessary?
>> >
>> > MSYS may be not necessary at all.
>>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Chiheng Xu wrote:
>
> Is 64-bits MSYS or Cygwin necessary?
>
> MSYS may be not necessary at all.
>
> If Cygwin merge the changes done in MSYS, and provide a Win32_Path
> mode(translating all Unix paths to Win32 paths at fork/exec or spawn)
all.
If Cygwin merge the changes done in MSYS, and provide a Win32_Path
mode(translating all Unix paths to Win32 paths at fork/exec or spawn)
and MinGW transform itself to use binary mode(linking with binmode.o
instead of txtmode.o) and slightly patch uname.exe in coreutils,
Cygwin has the potential
