Preface: this whole discussion REALLY boils down to: IANAL, YANAL, so
nobody needs to listen to either one of us (but the folks who wrote the
GPL FAQ *are* lawyers, so we should probably listen to them). Also, seek
competent counsel and pay for your own analysis of the licenses, if this
is a busine
On 8/31/2011 5:39 PM, K. Frank wrote:
> Wasn't there also some licensing issue? I never understood the details, but
> I recall seeing warnings, perhaps on one of these lists, that the
> pthreads-win32
> license was not as liberal as that of mingw / mingw-w64, and that there were
> things I couldn
On 3/14/2011 8:21 AM, Earnie wrote:
>>> An ugly workaround to the real problem is to put program A in a
>>> directory with its libstdc++-6.dll and put program B in another
>>> directory with its libstdc++-6.dll and then add the directories to PATH.
>>
>> This doesn't work, although I don't yet unde
Kai --
As your pseudo-reloc-v2 support has been integrated into the (32bit)
mingw runtime, I'd also like to add it to the cygwin runtime. However,
to do this I need some test cases demonstrating where v2 works and v1
doesn't.
I assume that, while developing the code for v2, you had some
quick-n-d
