On 14 December 2010 16:41, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 14 December 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
> What is GNU triplet for MSYS then? How different it is from the MinGW
> tripplet? Is it just a different ABI then?
>
> mingw-winnt - MinGW
> mingw-msys - MSYS
> w64-winn
On 14 December 2010 00:26, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> mingw32-winnt
>> mingw64-winnt
>> mingw32-msys
>> mingw64-msys
>> mingw32-cygwin
>> mingw64-cygwin
>>
>
> 8<
> MSYS is a collection of GNU utilities such as bash, make, gawk and
> grep to allow building of applications and programs which
On 11 October 2010 19:38, NightStrike wrote:
> Note
> that cygwin make doesn't work with -j because of a cygwin bug in fork.
That's not true. I regularly use it to build various different
programs, and it works just fine.
If you're referring to a more general issue with fork failures, the
reasons
On 23 September 2010 14:38, NightStrike wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>>>> Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows.
>>>>
>>>> No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would
On 21 September 2010 22:13, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 21 September 2010 12:51, Earnie wrote:
>> Andy Koppe wrote:
>>>> Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows.
>>>
>>> No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It wou
On 21 September 2010 12:51, Earnie wrote:
> Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> Cygwin isn't strictly obliged to provide an interface to Windows.
>>
>> No, but then it wouldn't really be Cyg*win* anymore. It would
>> effectively be Interix with a particularly slow fork()
On 20 September 2010 15:39, JonY wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:28 AM, JonY wrote:
>>> Will 64bit Cygwin be LP64 or LLP64? I sure hope its the former, but I
>>> don't know how much thunk is needed.
Interesting question. No idea what the answer is, but I guess LP64
would mean LONG == int and
