Re: [Mingw-w64-public] no_stack_protector attribute directive is ignored in file stack_chk_guard.c

在 2025-7-16 04:39, Pali Rohár 写道: The change should be applied also to v11.x, v12.x and v13.x branches as it is fixing the already applied commit. It's done now. -- Best regards, LIU Hao OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] no_stack_protector attribute directive is ignored in file stack_chk_guard.c

On Monday 14 July 2025 19:47:49 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 14 July 2025 10:46:36 LIU Hao wrote: > > 在 2025-7-13 23:02, Pali Rohár 写道: > > > I see. But I think it is better to apply at least this "debugging > > > purposes" attribute than nothing. It is only for older gcc versions. > > > And with

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Check for compiler support for `no_stack_protector`

在 2025-7-15 17:00, Martin Storsjö 写道: On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, LIU Hao wrote: -- Thanks, this looks reasonable to me (although I haven't tested it myself). Thanks. Pushed now, with the message amended a little. -- Best regards, LIU Hao OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital s

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Check for compiler support for `no_stack_protector`

On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, LIU Hao wrote: -- Thanks, this looks reasonable to me (although I haven't tested it myself). // Martin ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/min

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] New implementation for C95 conversion functions

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, Kirill Makurin wrote: I do not yet completely understand all aspects of mingw-w64's build process (which, for example, caused issues with btowc and wctob in this patch series), but I wonder if we could add Makefile.am to testcases subdirectory and define all tests in that Ma