LIU Hao wrote:
在 2023-02-08 20:50, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Thanks, this patch seems to work well for me with Clang! If there are
no other objections, I'd go ahead and push it.
Mostly looks good, except:
+#ifndef __has_builtin
+ #define __has_builtin(x) 0
+#endif
Do you have any prefer
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2023-02-08 20:50, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Thanks, this patch seems to work well for me with Clang! If there are no
other objections, I'd go ahead and push it.
Mostly looks good, except:
+#ifndef __has_builtin
+ #define __has_builtin(x) 0
+#endif
Do y
在 2023-02-08 20:50, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Thanks, this patch seems to work well for me with Clang! If there are no other objections, I'd go
ahead and push it.
Mostly looks good, except:
+#ifndef __has_builtin
+ #define __has_builtin(x) 0
+#endif
Do you have any preferences on the ind
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023, Christian Franke wrote:
LIU Hao wrote:
在 2023/2/2 06:41, Christian Franke 写道:
This patch allows to use _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 which is also supported by
GLIBC headers.
Thanks. This patch looks good to me. Pushed now.
BTW does clang support this as well? I suspect we should