From 2e215f993a0bc63b43b5d947a81ce8b22ab2ef1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 12:16:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add new APIs and symbols in hyperv headers
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/computecore.h | 2 ++
mingw
Thanks Liu, i have modified the patch and attached new one.
On 3/6/22 17:21, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2022-06-03 12:23, Rafael Lopez 写道:
Hi, I have attached a patch for missing prototypes snf definitions
for winsock2.h
First submission, feedback welcome :)
Thank you for the patch. However there
On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 2:16 PM LIU Hao wrote:
> ...
> I still consider it a bad idea to declare functions with the same names as
> standard ones. Why not
> rename it to `my_inet_ntop` for example? it would be much less error-prone.
>
>
Yes - there's wisdom in what you say.
However, "acting wisel
>> For the other functions, do the SSE intrinsics honor the rounding
>> mode/direction that you've set fesetround()?
>>
>> // Martin
>
> Documentation [1] doesn't seem to have such detail.
>
> Haven't booted to windows, but ran the following on i686 linux:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #i
On 6/3/22, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>
> For long double, I would presume that you'd still need to use x87, as SSE
> can't handle 80 bit long doubles, right? (Or converting down to a plain
> double first, then using SSE, probably also works - but I guess that also
> might generate x87 instructions.)
On Fri, 3 Jun 2022, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
Why are we using x87 asm instead of sse2 intrinsics for lrint/lrintf ?
E.g.: why not do something like the following?
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrintl.c b/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrintl.c
index d710fac..9f1be51 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrintl.c
+++
Why are we using x87 asm instead of sse2 intrinsics for lrint/lrintf ?
E.g.: why not do something like the following?
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrint.c b/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrint.c
index ec80e4e..7831446 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrint.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/math/lrint.c
@@ -5,10 +5,16
在 2022-06-03 12:23, Rafael Lopez 写道:
Hi, I have attached a patch for missing prototypes snf definitions for
winsock2.h
First submission, feedback welcome :)
Thank you for the patch. However there are indeed some issues:
1. Please use C89 comments instead of C++ comments.
2. Please keep fun
