On Sat, May 8, 2021, 01:28 Joachim Wuttke wrote:
> Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
> that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
> myself culpable by recommending use of your software.
>
> What is your position on this?
>
> Kind regards
FYI , you can find this:
https://www.spi-inc.org/projects/mingw/
Am Sa., 8. Mai 2021 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb sisyphus :
> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 11:13 PM Zach Bacon wrote:
>
> > Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
> > constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 11:13 PM Zach Bacon wrote:
> Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
> constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not.
>
Yeah, but that needs to be tested in a court first.
Keith has implied that it's "fait accompli", and that's
Because of trademarks, if it has mingw in the name, then it could
constitute as a violation, regardless if it has -w64 in it or not. However
like Biswa, I'm no lawyer.
On Sat., May 8, 2021, 9:05 a.m. Biswapriyo Nath,
wrote:
> This is not MinGW, this is MinGW-w64. BTW, I'm just a normal human not
This is not MinGW, this is MinGW-w64. BTW, I'm just a normal human not a
lawyer.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:28 PM Joachim Wuttke
wrote:
> Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
> that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
> myself culpable by recommending use of your software.
>
> What is your position on this?
>
>
:-))
Keith Marshall argues at https://stackoverflow.com/a/62865466/1017348
that you are doing illegal things, and that perhaps I am rendering
myself culpable by recommending use of your software.
What is your position on this?
Kind regards and thanks for mingw-w64, Joachim
_
