On Wed, 28 Apr 2021, Liu Hao wrote:
在 4/27/21 2:00 AM, Christian Franke 写道:
Which complexity do you mean - the extra cost of the system call or the
extra 15 lines of code?
Just for the record - I wouldn't mind applying the patch or something like
it. I agree with the arguments that it wo
在 2021-05-03 00:39, Dan Raymond 写道:
I don't agree with this. First: precision and accuracy are two entirely different things so it's
important not to use them interchangeably. It is true that the absolute value of the wall clock
time is not likely to be very accurate. If you are interested in
在 2021-05-03 01:53, Biswapriyo Nath 写道:
From 3bde731614cf9ea87f75a98752b905785b984485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 23:21:56 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in shlwapi.h
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/shlwa
From 3bde731614cf9ea87f75a98752b905785b984485 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 23:21:56 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] headers: Add missing names in shlwapi.h
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/shlwapi.h | 32 -
1. `clock_gettime()` is not meant to be precise, and it shouldn't be,
because the extra accuracy is useless. (It may make some sense for
logging, as mentioned in another message; but in logs only the order
of writes matters, while timestamps don't matter.)
I don't agree with this. First: pr
在 2021-05-02 17:58, DAVID MAY 写道:
On 2/05/2021 1:28 pm, Liu Hao wrote:
Please use `WINBOOL` instead of `BOOL` as the latter is a builtin type
on Mac.
There are more `BOOL`s in the original file, they should be replaced as
well.
See attached patch with changes you requested.
Thanks for th
On 2/05/2021 1:28 pm, Liu Hao wrote:
>
> Please use `WINBOOL` instead of `BOOL` as the latter is a builtin type
> on Mac.
>
> There are more `BOOL`s in the original file, they should be replaced as
> well.
>
See attached patch with changes you requested.
--
David May
--- doc/mingw64-shlwapi.h
