Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Add missing function declarations to mingw-w64-headers/include/shlwapi.h

在 2021-04-28 22:54, DAVID MAY 写道: Thank you for your feedback. I removed those changes. Updated patch attached. Thanks for the update. This patch looks mostly good, except for one thing: + STDAPI_(BOOL) SHRegGetBoolValueFromHKCUHKLM(PCWSTR pszKey, PCWSTR pszValue, BOOL fDefault); + LW

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] crt: Increase precision of gettimeofday() if possible.

在 2021-04-29 03:34, Christian Franke 写道: BTW.2: The *ftime*() functions from newer versions of MSVC CRT also use GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime() if available. UCRTBASE.DLL still uses `GetSystemTimeAsFileTime()`. It does not even have an entry for the precise one in its import directory

[Mingw-w64-public] Question: Should opaque UCRT structures be added?

Some projects like ruby, perl, gnulib etc. uses the iobuf and ioinfo structures heavily. Is it possible to add those structure definition for UCRT here? Just asking :) ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://list

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] rdtsc patch

I think you forgot to attach your patch or it got filtered out. On Sat., May 1, 2021, 9:20 p.m. sotrdg sotrdg, wrote: > > > Sent from Mail for > Windows 10 > > > ___ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Ming

[Mingw-w64-public] rdtsc patch

Sent from Mail for Windows 10 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

[Mingw-w64-public] build fail for GCC 12

../../../mingw-w64/mingw-w64-crt/intrincs/rdtsc.c:15:30: error: macro "__rdtsc" passed 1 arguments, but takes just 0 15 | unsigned __int64 __rdtsc(void) | ^ In file included from /home/cqwrteur/all_mingw_toolchains/x86_64-w64-mingw32/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw3

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Question: Should not the UCRT _iobuf condition be in every declaration?

在 2021-05-01 13:41, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: The `void *_Placeholder` was added in struct _iobuf in stdio.h only. But struct _iobuf is declared in other three headers also. Thoughts attached. How about removing the struct definition? It looks unused, except by the typedef. So this ``` typede