Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/2] headers/winuser.h: add missing symbols and defines

2020-08-09 Thread Biswapriyo Nath
Updated. From 5d931ec8139df750f452d5d68afa8109c8f4356e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Biswapriyo Nath Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2020 11:20:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] headers/winuser.h: add missing symbols and defines Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath --- mingw-w64-headers/include/winuser.h | 283 +++

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/2] headers/winuser.h: add missing symbols and defines

2020-08-09 Thread Liu Hao
在 2020/8/9 下午2:40, Biswapriyo Nath 写道: > @@ -1311,6 +1360,10 @@ extern "C" { > #define WM_TOUCHHITTESTING 0x024d > #define WM_POINTERWHEEL 0x024e > #define WM_POINTERHWHEEL 0x024f > +#define WM_POINTERHITTEST 0x0250 ...^ DM_POINTERHITTEST (This name looks weird there but tha

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] dxva2api.h problem?

2020-08-09 Thread Liu Hao
在 2020/8/9 下午6:06, John Warburton 写道: > Good morning, > > Thank you for reading this. > > Since the latest trunk updates, a problem happens when cross-compiling Qt5 > with x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ > > To my eyes, it seems to be centred around the construction (void *)&f32. Is > supplying "-fpermis

[Mingw-w64-public] dxva2api.h problem?

2020-08-09 Thread John Warburton
Good morning, Thank you for reading this. Since the latest trunk updates, a problem happens when cross-compiling Qt5 with x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ To my eyes, it seems to be centred around the construction (void *)&f32. Is supplying "-fpermissive" sufficient to put away this worry? Compiler outpu