在 2020/4/5 3:52, Martin Storsjö 写道:
>
> In this case - I hadn't expected you to verify it before pushing, I had
> expected the patch author to try to use it - but if you do such checks
> before pushing, it's really commendable!
>
> In this case, it turns out that it didn't pick up the issue, beca
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2020/4/4 18:03, Biswapriyo Nath 写道:
...
The CRT built fine. I pushed this patch.
Thanks!
// Martin
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lis
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2020/4/4 16:28, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Did you actually test this at all, in any way, whatsoever?
Because the newly added function declarations use the types
MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER and PCFG_CALL_TARGET_INFO, that aren't declared
anywhere in mingw-w64 headers.
在 2020/4/4 18:03, Biswapriyo Nath 写道:
> ...
>
>
>
The CRT built fine. I pushed this patch.
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
ht
...
From ffe1bc72a92480b5246afc03df206abef7eceff7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 14:49:12 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] headers: winnt add structures for memory APIs
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/winnt.h | 76
在 2020/4/4 16:28, Martin Storsjö 写道:
>
> Did you actually test this at all, in any way, whatsoever?
>
> Because the newly added function declarations use the types
> MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER and PCFG_CALL_TARGET_INFO, that aren't declared
> anywhere in mingw-w64 headers.
>
Hmm.. how could this c
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
Yes, I have a patch for it. I am doing it one by one. I thought it will be
easier to patch one header at a time. Apology for any inconvenience.
Patching headers one at a time is ok in itself, but you have to make sure
the tree actually works after ea
Yes, I have a patch for it. I am doing it one by one. I thought it will be
easier to patch one header at a time. Apology for any inconvenience.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
...
Did you actually test this at all, in any way, whatsoever?
Because the newly added function declarations use the types
MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER and PCFG_CALL_TARGET_INFO, that aren't declared
anywhere in mingw-w64 headers.
This breaks building
