在 2020/2/23 6:06, Martin Storsjö 写道:
> While they are "wrong" in that sense, this now means that there is no
> symbol "snprintf" defined at all, which does break compilation of a
> number of projects. (That primarily happens within configure scripts of
> certain projects, that try to detect if "snp
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Sunday 23 February 2020 22:37:43 Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Pali Rohár wrote:
Also another detail I noticed in your patch:
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c b/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c
index 93300113..0bb5556f 100644
-
On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, Pali Rohár wrote:
Also another detail I noticed in your patch:
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c b/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c
index 93300113..0bb5556f 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/stdio/snprintf.c
@@ -12,7 +12,27 @@ int __cd
I've been thinking some more about this and maybe we are going about it
wrong. How did we get here in the first place? I don't know the entire
history of MinGW but I suspect this came about from the very early days
when people were trying to port Unix applications to Windows. Those
applicati