W dniu 05.01.2019 o 20:59, Johannes Pfau pisze:
> Am 05.01.19 um 18:56 schrieb Mateusz:
>> ucrtbase.dll is affected too (msvcr100 works OK), so maybe it is better to
>> add your access() function to msvcr110/120 and ucrtbase (as a replacement)
>> instead of patching GCC.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mateusz
Am 05.01.19 um 18:56 schrieb Mateusz:
ucrtbase.dll is affected too (msvcr100 works OK), so maybe it is better to add
your access() function to msvcr110/120 and ucrtbase (as a replacement) instead
of patching GCC.
Regards,
Mateusz
Maybe it would make sense to add this in crt/io.h? There's alr
W dniu 05.01.2019 o 15:32, Liu Hao pisze:
> 在 2019/1/5 21:14, Johannes Pfau 写道:
>> Liu Hao:
>>> There are a few resolution to this at different levels. The most ideal
>>> solution would be providing an `access()` function that behaves
>>> expectedly in gnulib or libiberty, so this recipe can be por
在 2019/1/5 21:14, Johannes Pfau 写道:
> Liu Hao:
>> There are a few resolution to this at different levels. The most ideal
>> solution would be providing an `access()` function that behaves
>> expectedly in gnulib or libiberty, so this recipe can be ported
>> elsewhere. Modifying GCC source should be
Liu Hao:
> There are a few resolution to this at different levels. The most ideal
> solution would be providing an `access()` function that behaves
> expectedly in gnulib or libiberty, so this recipe can be ported
> elsewhere. Modifying GCC source should be considered the least preferred
> and last
