在 2019/1/3 23:05, Jacek Caban 写道:
>
> We could, but that's not my point. If other toolchain always declare
> those extensions in C++, this practically becomes a standard that may
> make sense for us to follow.
>
Most of such things are part of the POSIX standard. But as you have
pointed out latt
W dniu 03.01.2019 o 17:05, Jacek Caban pisze:
> On 1/3/19 4:47 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> Hi Mateusz,
>>
>> On 1/2/19 5:45 PM, Mateusz wrote:
>>> W dniu 02.01.2019 o 16:32, JonY via Mingw-w64-public pisze:
On 1/2/19 1:10 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm currently adding
On 1/3/19 4:47 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
On 1/2/19 5:45 PM, Mateusz wrote:
W dniu 02.01.2019 o 16:32, JonY via Mingw-w64-public pisze:
On 1/2/19 1:10 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently adding (some basic) MinGW support to the D code which
was recently merged into GCC9
Hi Mateusz,
On 1/2/19 5:45 PM, Mateusz wrote:
W dniu 02.01.2019 o 16:32, JonY via Mingw-w64-public pisze:
On 1/2/19 1:10 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Hello all,
I'm currently adding (some basic) MinGW support to the D code which
was recently merged into GCC9. The D runtime library already has ful
On 12/31/18 9:03 AM, Liu Hao wrote:
在 2018/12/31 2:56, Jacek Caban 写道:
Hello,
We currently have a few checks for strict more in our math.h. It guards
some non-standard (or at least not present in requested standard
version) declarations. Some of those are pretty standard things like
M_PI, other
On 1/3/19 9:11 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am 03.01.19 um 07:46 schrieb Liu Hao:
>> 在 2019/1/3 3:27, Johannes Pfau 写道:
>>> Am 02.01.19 um 18:02 schrieb Mateusz:
W dniu 02.01.2019 o 14:10, Johannes Pfau pisze:
> BTW: How do you handle branches for the patches? The attached patch
> is aga
Am 03.01.19 um 07:46 schrieb Liu Hao:
在 2019/1/3 3:27, Johannes Pfau 写道:
Am 02.01.19 um 18:02 schrieb Mateusz:
W dniu 02.01.2019 o 14:10, Johannes Pfau pisze:
BTW: How do you handle branches for the patches? The attached patch
is against the v6.x branch.
I didn't read this, sorry for noise in
