The whitespace was inconsistent in this area, so I replaced the tabs
with spaces.
-tom
From eeaca371370ce9e4996a1a4c6a598205866a2c44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Ritter
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:19:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fix whitespace near the PROCESS_MITIGATION structs
---
mingw-
GCC 8 from r248028 has defined function _xgetbv and we should
avoid double definition of this function.
Please review.
Mateusz
From 5aa15ee4a5f04cdc797deb685d23dc67275af357 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mateusz
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:58:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] intrin-impl.h: do not define
On 01/22/2018 09:30 PM, Kai Tietz via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
> Hmm, ok. Shouldn't we special case unnamed union/struct?
Unless I'm missing something, all structs are named in this patch.
Thanks for reviews,
Jacek
--
Ok.
Thanks,
Kai
2018-01-22 19:00 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban :
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
> ---
> mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h | 587
> +++
> 1 file changed, 587 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h
>
>
>
>
Hmm, ok. Shouldn't we special case unnamed union/struct?
Kai
2018-01-22 19:00 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban :
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
> ---
> mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_1.h | 53
>
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>
>
>
> ---
Patch is ok.
Kai
2018-01-22 19:00 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban :
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
> ---
> mingw-w64-headers/include/d2d1_1.h | 1 -
> mingw-w64-headers/include/d2dbasetypes.h | 9 -
> mingw-w64-headers/include/dcommon.h | 22 ++
> 3 files changed, 2
Patch is ok.
Thanks,
Kai
2018-01-22 19:00 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban :
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
> ---
> mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite.h | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant te
Hi Tom,
On 01/22/2018 07:15 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> mingw-w64-headers/include/error.h| 1 +
> mingw-w64-headers/include/winerror.h | 1 +
> mingw-w64-headers/include/winnt.h| 29 -
> mingw-w64-tools/widl/include/winnt.h | 1 +
The version in widl/ subdirecto
Firefox bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1431809
This syncs the PRODUCT_ENTERPRISE_XXX defines between widl and
headers, and declares ERROR_INVALID_TOKEN in headers
-tom
From d258bc0274c8b1b63ed8ea4d31e6ab8a8b621833 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Ritter
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 201
Afraid I was too eager, the newly attached one correctly defines
ERROR_INVALID_TOKEN in all the places.
-tom
On 22 January 2018 at 11:58, Tom Ritter wrote:
> Firefox bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1431809
>
> This syncs the PRODUCT_ENTERPRISE_XXX defines between widl and
> hea
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h | 587
+++
1 file changed, 587 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_3.h
new
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_1.h | 53
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_1.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite_1.h
index c0d15acb..56728da1 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/includ
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/d2d1_1.h | 1 -
mingw-w64-headers/include/d2dbasetypes.h | 9 -
mingw-w64-headers/include/dcommon.h | 22 ++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/includ
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite.h | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite.h
index 122d0bf6..7269dff5 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/dwrite.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-headers/inclu
On 01/21/2018 05:26 PM, Kai Tietz via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
> Patch is ok. But this is indeed problematic that clang doesn't support
> different scanf/printf warning API.
> For C99 printf/canf formatter diagnostic the produced warnings will be
> wrong for this compiler.
Yeah, I hope it will be f
On 01/22/2018 11:29 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
>
>> On 12/22/2017 01:05 PM, JonY wrote:
>>> Attached patch OK?
>>>
>>
>> Oops, I missed the OK message, here's a rebased version, patch OK?
>
> LGTM
>
> // Martin
>
Done, pushed to master.
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, JonY via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
On 12/22/2017 01:05 PM, JonY wrote:
Attached patch OK?
Oops, I missed the OK message, here's a rebased version, patch OK?
LGTM
// Martin
--
Check out the vibr
17 matches
Mail list logo