On 12/22/2017 01:05 PM, JonY wrote:
> Attached patch OK?
>
Oops, I missed the OK message, here's a rebased version, patch OK?
From a530d5a514b90fa2e5144b8c37a2039701dc4d5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:03:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] [PATC
Patch is ok. But this is indeed problematic that clang doesn't support
different scanf/printf warning API.
For C99 printf/canf formatter diagnostic the produced warnings will be
wrong for this compiler.
Thanks
Kai
2018-01-21 12:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Storsjö :
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Jacek Caban wrot
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018, Jacek Caban wrote:
clang doesn't support it, so it emits tons of warnings.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/crt/stdio.h | 21 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
LGTM
// Martin
--
clang doesn't support it, so it emits tons of warnings.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban
---
mingw-w64-headers/crt/stdio.h | 21 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/stdio.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/stdio.h
index c0243ec1..357549f1
Hi,
On 1/20/18 8:54 PM, Mateusz wrote:
Hello,
The patch "intrin-impl.h: Use volatile argument for __buildbittesti-based
functions."
is not working well for me (I can't compile GCC with this patch).
The problem is with one extra 'volatile':
@@ -615,28 +614,28 @@ __buildstos(__stosq, unsigned
