Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] intrin-impl.h: Use volatile argument for __buildbittesti-based functions.

Patch is ok. Thanks, Kai 2018-01-19 18:38 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : > Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban > --- > mingw-w64-headers/include/psdk_inc/intrin-impl.h | 83 > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > > > --

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] intrin-impl.h: Use volatile argument for __buildbittesti-based functions.

Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban --- mingw-w64-headers/include/psdk_inc/intrin-impl.h | 83 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/psdk_inc/intrin-impl.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/psdk_inc/intrin-impl.h index 6f7d60ec..ed5e9

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] intrin-impl.h: Added missing volatile to _interlockedbittestandset and _interlockedbittestandset64 declarations.

On 01/12/2018 03:25 AM, Liu Hao wrote: > On 2018/1/12 4:28, Jacek Caban wrote: >> Fixes compilation with clang. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban >> --- >> mingw-w64-headers/include/psdk_inc/intrin-impl.h | 16 >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > If the last pa

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] linux gcc vs mingw-w64 performance ?

Here's the whole benchmark so far: tls method 1 thread 2 threads ---linux-- __thread610 100% 600 98% ---mingw-- [ TlsGet