On 2017/3/17 11:09, David Grayson wrote:
> Here is that patch again. Thanks!
These new prototypes match
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms647464.aspx ,
so I think it is ok to apply, no?
--
Best regards,
LH_Mouse
---
Hello.
Here is that patch again. Thanks!
--David Grayson
>From 63f1126b246df52e4252d148897f3e262931368b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Grayson
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 19:35:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use LPCVOID instead of 'const LPVOID' for VerQueryValue.
Apparently "const LPVOID" is di
Hello,
If you want to solve this, you will need to use the large Code model.
Cheers,
Kai
Am 15.02.2017 06:43 schrieb "Roger Pack" :
> On 2/8/17, Ricardo Constantino wrote:
> > On 8 February 2017 at 02:55, Liu Hao wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017/2/8 1:45, Ricardo Constantino wrote:
> >> > Should be fi
On 2017/3/17 0:51, David Grayson wrote:
> I was trying to compile Qt and I ran into an error because Qt is
> passing a const pointer to the first argument of VerQueryValue, which
> is not properly marked as const in the mingw-w64 header files. This
> patch fixes that.
Please send the patch both in
I was trying to compile Qt and I ran into an error because Qt is
passing a const pointer to the first argument of VerQueryValue, which
is not properly marked as const in the mingw-w64 header files. This
patch fixes that.
Apparently "const LPVOID" is different from "LPCVOID". You can see
the diff
