On 10/17/2016 2:34 AM, JonY wrote:
> On 10/17/2016 10:17, David Wohlferd wrote:
>> Is that the same as "approved for push?" Or am I still waiting to
>> hear from someone? I'm told you are the 'makefile' approver.
>>
> Yes, you can go ahead and push.
Thank you. Pushed.
dw
-
Hello,
I'm porting Clang 3.9 for MSYS2 ("porting" is a big word for it since most
of the patches are done by Martell), right now it can build not too
complicated software.
When trying to compile 64bit Clang with itself it thrown this error (Clang
32 bit and GCC 6.2 32/64 bit are fine):
In file inc
Thank you.
2016-10-17 14:16 GMT+02:00 Martell Malone :
> Jon_y beat me to it. :)
> I had modified it to fit within a reasonable line character limit with this
> adjustment.
>
> Author: mati865
> Date: Mon Oct 17 12:08:24 2016 +
>
> fix uchar.h for Clang
>
> Clang defines itself as
> I'd probably create a new exception handling model and conditionalize
> whatever code you need based on that.
That would require copy-n-paste of tons of code...
All this remains contingent on Microsoft's generosity because
they don't provide APIs for SEH on x86, unlike on x64.
So I have to reu
Jon_y beat me to it. :)
I had modified it to fit within a reasonable line character limit with this
adjustment.
Author: mati865
Date: Mon Oct 17 12:08:24 2016 +
fix uchar.h for Clang
Clang defines itself as GCC 4.2.1 and triggers check for GCC lower than
4.4.0.
This patch
Can some commit it?
śr., 28 wrz 2016, 16:29 użytkownik JonY
napisał:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 9/28/2016 18:02, Mateusz wrote:
> > Looks attachment didn't work. Here is the patch:
> >
> >> From e98ec7a116256108831f035eb0a7f0f2fdf049e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> >> 200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/17/2016 10:17, David Wohlferd wrote:
>
> Is that the same as "approved for push?" Or am I still waiting to
> hear from someone? I'm told you are the 'makefile' approver.
>
Yes, you can go ahead and push.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iF
