Also: http://mingw-w64.org/doku.php/versions
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:03 PM Norbert Pfeiler <
norbert.pfeiler+mingw-...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I, too, think alphabetical order is seen as intentionally unbiased.
> It’s not like there are 3 projects starting with AAA anyway.
>
> > (except for the fact
The disagreement of glibc and mingw-w64 (in my opinion) is definitely glibc's
bug:
lh_mouse@lhmouse-dev:~$ cat test3.c
#include
#include
int main(){
double x = 10.001000;
double y = 0.701000;
int quo;
double rem = remquo(x, y
Found an example on cppreference:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/math/remquo
The example shows that, since `cos()` is periodic,
adding 1 * PI to its parameter doesn't change the result.
But, we can also say that, subtracting 1 * PI
from its parameter should not c
Hello guys,
I am testing my `remquo()` implementation when I find that `remquo`
on Linux (using glibc) and on Windows (using mingw-w64) generate
different results. I don't think this is the correct behavior. Any ideas?
The testcases in file `remquo.txt` the attached zip file was generated
on my VP
Hello,
I noticed there were two release candidates of mingw-w64: 5.0rc1 and 5.0rc2
before spring, but no final 5.0.0 tag since then.
May I ask why ?
--
___
Mingw-w64-public ma
I, too, think alphabetical order is seen as intentionally unbiased.
It’s not like there are 3 projects starting with AAA anyway.
> (except for the fact that there should be two lists and not one)
Why do you think there should be 2 lists?
I would split it in native and cross toolchains.
Additional
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sep 4, 2016 6:50 PM, "Adrien Nader" wrote:
> >
> > Additionaly, the list of projects using mingw-w64 is now sorted and
> > always displayed in full.
>
> This was always randomized on purpose, and for very good reason: we don't
> want to give preferent
On Sep 4, 2016 6:50 PM, "Adrien Nader" wrote:
>
> Additionaly, the list of projects using mingw-w64 is now sorted and
> always displayed in full.
This was always randomized on purpose, and for very good reason: we don't
want to give preferential treatment to projects based on names starting
with
That, I can arrange it by hand. I thought it ws fine for you now and I
had added you to the right group to edit the pages. I'll get you a new
password by hand this evening.
--
Adrien Nader
--
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 18:47:37 +0200, Adrien Nader wrote:
> I've fixed the ACLs and reverted the bad changes and re-applied the good
> ones.
> Editing the start, download, download:* and donations pages require
> being in the "trusted" group while the default is "users"; members of
> the "admin" grou
10 matches
Mail list logo
