On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, dw wrote:
On 8/15/2016 4:54 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
but 30 of these would be a huge hassle for the approvers as well.
Not really, if they are well contained with an explanation matching it
close by, it's trivial to review.
Historically my experiences haven't been good
On 8/15/2016 4:54 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
but 30 of these would be a huge hassle for the approvers as well.
Not really, if they are well contained with an explanation matching it
close by, it's trivial to review.
Historically my experiences haven't been good in this area. But if you
are pr
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, dw wrote:
>>> - _vswprintf_p.c, _vscwprintf_p.c - these also add a comment that wasn't
>>> there before. Probably ok, but I guess it's preferrable to have such
>>> changes split out.
>>> - aviriff.h, I see no other changes than adding in leading zeros
>
> Yes, that's t
Dear All,
I don't know how/where to report this or how to debug the issue,
please let me know what I can do. I tried upgrading protobuf to the
new 3.0.0 release in Alexpux/MINGW-packages. However gcc hangs when
compiling the tests, in file:
https://github.com/google/protobuf/blob/master/src/googl
