Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Clean build of mingw-w64 (ie no more warning)

2016-08-14 Thread dw
On 8/14/2016 9:23 AM, NightStrike wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, dw wrote: >> >>> I still have some more fixes for ARM, but this patch is getting too >>> big. >>> This is a logical point to break. >> Yes, that's probably for the best. >> >>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Clean build of mingw-w64 (ie no more warning)

2016-08-14 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, NightStrike wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, dw wrote: I still have some more fixes for ARM, but this patch is getting too big. This is a logical point to break. Yes, that's probably for the best. If/when committing (i

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Clean build of mingw-w64 (ie no more warning)

2016-08-14 Thread NightStrike
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, dw wrote: > >> I still have some more fixes for ARM, but this patch is getting too big. >> This is a logical point to break. > > Yes, that's probably for the best. > > If/when committing (iirc someone had already ok'd it

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Clean build of mingw-w64 (ie no more warning)

2016-08-14 Thread Martin Storsjö
On Sat, 13 Aug 2016, dw wrote: > I still have some more fixes for ARM, but this patch is getting too big. > This is a logical point to break. Yes, that's probably for the best. If/when committing (iirc someone had already ok'd it?), I think it'd be even better to split it further, to one commi