[Mingw-w64-public] release possible

Thanks for all the work on mingw-w64, awesome job. Might be nice to cut a release as well, I know that FFmpeg dshow module will soon be having to depend on git master, would be nice to be able to depend on a release version :) Cheers! -roger- --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

Vincent Torri writes: > my point is that the timestamp is incorrect (it is set to 0, which is wrong) Yes, that was clear from your first message. binutils can be cofigured with --enable-deterministic-archives. Maybe your binutils was configured that way? Please note that I don't know if that o

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Vincent Torri > writes: > Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? >>> >>> For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp >>> to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

Vincent Torri writes: >>> Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? >> >> For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp >> to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-w64 >> toolchain (32 bits). > > i've just read that this option

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Vincent Torri > writes: > >> Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? > > For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp > to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-w64 > to

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

Vincent Torri writes: > Can someone confirm that ? If yes, is it possible to fix this ? For obtaining reproducible binaries I had to pass --no-insert-timestamp to the linker. That was last December, using the MSYS2's MinGW-w64 toolchain (32 bits). --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

It's not a problem of striping files or not (the debug section is not involved here). But anyway, i've just did this : gcc -g -O2 -o pi pi.c then, I run the sigcheck tool. Here is the output : $ /sigcheck.exe ./pi.exe Sigcheck v2.50 - File version and signature viewer Copyright (C) 2004-2016 Ma

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

I cannot reproduce that. maybe, you strip output binaries? From: Vincent Torri Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 17:34 To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ? Hello

[Mingw-w64-public] does linker correctly set the creation date of a PE file ?

Hello with my little Examine tool, or with the 'sigcheck' tool from sysinternal, it seems that the TimeDateStamp field of the IMAGE_FILE_HEADER structure, which is "the date and time the image was created by the linker" (see https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms680313%28v=vs.