Thanks, Jon! If you want to add warn_unused_result, that seems fine
to me. --David
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:57 PM, JonY wrote:
> On 8/18/2015 02:20, David Grayson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>>> The patch looks good to me.
>>
>> I think it's good too, but it
On 8/18/2015 02:20, David Grayson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>> The patch looks good to me.
>
> I think it's good too, but it looks like it (intsafe_2.2.1.patch)
> hasn't been committed to the git repository. Can someone commit it?
>
Does it make sense to add
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
> The patch looks good to me.
I think it's good too, but it looks like it (intsafe_2.2.1.patch)
hasn't been committed to the git repository. Can someone commit it?
--David
--
On 08/15/15 19:51, Jacek Caban wrote:
> On 08/14/15 21:06, Erik van Pienbroek wrote:
>> Jacek Caban schreef op di 11-08-2015 om 15:20 [+0200]:
>>> I just pushed cherry-picks to the branch.
> Hi Erik,
>
>> Hi Jacek,
>>
>> Apparently the just released wine-gecko 2.40 also requires several
>> addition
