Patch OK?
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/wspiapi.h
b/mingw-w64-headers/include/wspiapi.h
index 3328955..476a561 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/wspiapi.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-headers/include/wspiapi.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
#ifndef __cplusplus
#define _WSPIAPI_COUNTOF(_Array) (sizeof(_Arra
On 8/4/2015 02:20, Martell Malone wrote:
> I would like to not that I sent something into the LLVM mailing list on
> this also.
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/gAFEY5R0Qkc
>
> It seems that it is not a very easy thing to change on their end so it may
> be best to work around it
On 8/4/2015 03:35, Martell Malone wrote:
> Clang defines __rdtsc as inline in intrin.h
>
> mingw-w64-crt/intrincs/rdtsc.c:9:18: error: redefinition of '__rdtsc'
> unsigned __int64 __rdtsc(void)
> ^
> clang\3.7.0\include\ia32intrin.h:89:1: note: previous definition is here
> __rdts
Hi,
Have the executables using the winpthread library been rebuilt?
--
Adrien Nader
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.s
Clang defines __rdtsc as inline in intrin.h
mingw-w64-crt/intrincs/rdtsc.c:9:18: error: redefinition of '__rdtsc'
unsigned __int64 __rdtsc(void)
^
clang\3.7.0\include\ia32intrin.h:89:1: note: previous definition is here
__rdtsc(void) {
This bypasses that inline when building the
I would like to not that I sent something into the LLVM mailing list on
this also.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/gAFEY5R0Qkc
It seems that it is not a very easy thing to change on their end so it may
be best to work around it for now.
This is the only place that it is used
Kind
I'd like some feedback on this patch if possible
Kind Regards
Martell
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/math/log1pl.S b/mingw-w64-crt/math/log1pl.S
index 7ff0f5b..5c17ae4 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-crt/math/log1pl.S
+++ b/mingw-w64-crt/math/log1pl.S
@@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
-1 + sqrt(2) / 2 <= x <= 1 - sqrt(2
Thanks, Hannes,
That did the trick.
But let me think if I understand it correctly. 64 bit ld introduces start,
end, size, etc. variables with underscores whereas 32 bit one does that
without? Not that I think that either is the "standard", but I think that
should be the same for both. Just my two
Hello, Jacek. Thanks for taking a look at my patch!
1) I will add "#if __GNUC__ >= 5" around the parts that use the new built-ins.
2) I'll remove the change to limits.h
3) I'll remove the link to my GitHub; I was hoping people would use my script
to regenerate the header but it's fine if they
Hello
Andrej Balkonski schrieb am 17:44 Montag, 3.August
2015:
> Hello everybody,
> I have a problem with linking-in binary data into a 32 bit Windows executable
> using mingw-w64.
> I'm doing this on Linux (Kubuntu 14.04.2 LTS) but the same thing also
> manifests itself on Windows machine(s)
Hello everybody,
I have a problem with linking-in binary data into a 32 bit Windows
executable using mingw-w64.
I'm doing this on Linux (Kubuntu 14.04.2 LTS) but the same thing also
manifests itself on Windows machine(s).
Not to repeat myself, I'll just post a link to already posted explanation:
Hi David,
That's a nice work, thanks!
On 08/02/15 21:17, David Grayson wrote:
> Hello. Attached is version 2.0.0 of the patch, which is very
> different and only supports GCC 5 and above, because it uses new
> built-in functions. This version is only 331 lines long (down from
> ~1600). It is e
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:26 PM, lh_mouse wrote:
> ISO C11 requires operations on the same stream (or whatever a FILE struct
> handles) _not_ to interleave with each other.
> This should include outputting each character using puts() or printf()
> functions, since they both manipulate the `stdou
13 matches
Mail list logo
