Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] New Discovery Keys file

Replaced LGPL with the PD Disclaimer and committed :) On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > Hi Martell, > > I can't accept this patch as you are using here LGPL license. The > accepted mingw-w64's licenses are either ZPL (as PD isn't accepted in > all jurisdications), BSD, MIT, or

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] New Discovery Keys file

Hi Martell, I can't accept this patch as you are using here LGPL license. The accepted mingw-w64's licenses are either ZPL (as PD isn't accepted in all jurisdications), BSD, MIT, or any other none-copyleft license. We accept LGPL-licenses only for headers we are adopting from other ventures, lik

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] - Hardening libssp against malicious local processes

Hi Jacek Jacek Caban: > Thanks for the patch, but it belongs to GCC and as such gcc-patches ML > is the right place to send it. > > I have nothing to do with libssp nor have much experience with GCC > patches, but I have some suggestions: thanks for both. I'll send it to gcc-patches to see what

[Mingw-w64-public] cygwin and mingw-w64

I'm not sure if this is a cygwin question or a mingw-w64 question. I'm working on fixing the _lrotl stuff. The changes for intrin.h and intrin-impl.h were easy. But for whatever reason, MS duplicates the prototypes for this function in stdlib.h. I have started to update mingw-w64's stdlib.h,