[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 2/2] pthread.h: Remove duplicate declaration of pthread_delay_np

2015-01-06 Thread dongsheng . song
From: 宋冬生 --- mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pthread.h index 9b4b3f2..74bab75 100644 --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/include/pt

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH 1/2] stdlib.h: Add mkstemp implementation.

2015-01-06 Thread dongsheng . song
From: 宋冬生 --- mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am | 2 +- mingw-w64-crt/misc/mkstemp.c | 91 ++ mingw-w64-headers/crt/stdlib.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 mingw-w64-crt/misc/mkstemp.c diff --git a/mingw-w64-c

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] feature request for mkstemp

2015-01-06 Thread LRN
On 06.01.2015 20:03, Roger Pack wrote: > On 1/5/15, LRN wrote: >> On 06.01.2015 2:38, Roger Pack wrote: >>> Hello all. >>> As a note, it would be nice to have an mkstemp method defined [1] >>> >>> I know gnutls should probably work around it, but it would be a nice >>> convenience as well, I saw t

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] feature request for mkstemp

2015-01-06 Thread Roger Pack
On 1/5/15, LRN wrote: > On 06.01.2015 2:38, Roger Pack wrote: >> Hello all. >> As a note, it would be nice to have an mkstemp method defined [1] >> >> I know gnutls should probably work around it, but it would be a nice >> convenience as well, I saw these other comments in various projects: >> >>

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 13:26 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : > On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : >>> On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: > On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: >> Maybe I missed s

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/06/15 12:49, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : >> On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >>> Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: > Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perf

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2015-01-06 12:22 GMT+01:00 Jacek Caban : > On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: >> Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: >>> On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and I'm not sure what we should d

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Mass rebuild report for January 03 2015

2015-01-06 Thread Jacek Caban
On 01/05/15 21:58, Erik van Pienbroek wrote: > Jacek Caban schreef op ma 05-01-2015 om 14:05 [+0100]: >> On 01/04/15 12:49, Jacek Caban wrote: >>> Maybe I missed some better options for us. None of above is perfect and >>> I'm not sure what we should do about it. Solution 2. seems the least >>> p