Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Missing Active Directory Libraries?

2014-12-15 Thread josealf
PING? I can post the minimal samle code if needed, but mybe someone knows why the libraries libactiveds.a and libadsnta are not include in the 32bit compiler toolchains... Thanks for you reply. -Original Message- From: "Jose Alf." Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 22:27:15 To: mingw-w64-public

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] windows 32 bit memory address space

2014-12-15 Thread Jim Michaels
wait - shouldn't --large-address-aware be more than 4GiB? I thought there was a mode where you could get nice flat address space. that's just too small for some of my programs. the g++ won't even compile them because the functions are too large. =:-O - Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.co

[Mingw-w64-public] [ANN] Win-builds 1.5-rc3 - simpler, more packages, GUI package manager, almost final release

2014-12-15 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi, The third release candidate for Win-builds 1.5 is now available. Win-builds is a fully-free and open-source, fully-bootstrapped and multi-platform project which provides compilers, libraries and tools for Windows along with cross-compilers from Linux (or any system with a GNU userspace). The

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] windows 32 bit memory address space

2014-12-15 Thread Rashad M
Hello, On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Rashad M wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kai Tietz > wrote: > >> Hi Rashad, >> >> 2014-10-27 20:13 GMT+01:00 Pavel : >> > Hi Rashad, >> > >> > I believe this is given by the 32 bit implementation of Win32 API >> > (surprisingly, the API on

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] any reason why stack overflow just calling plain function?

2014-12-15 Thread Jim Michaels
#define DEBUG 1 #define PROGRAM_DESCRIPTION "find regex string in files and dir trees" #define PROGRAM_VERSION "1.0" #define PROGRAM_NAME "egrepsed" #define LINEBUFSIZE 8388608 //#define LICENSE //#define COPYRIGHT     #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #inclu

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] any reason why stack overflow just calling plain function?

2014-12-15 Thread Jim Michaels
4194304 and 8388608 cause a problem, but 1048576 does not.  - Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com j...@renewalcomputerservices.com http://RenewalComputerServices.com http://JesusnJim.com (computer repair info, programming) From: David Macek To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] any reason why stack overflow just calling plain function?

2014-12-15 Thread Jim Michaels
it's when I do:    char line[LINEBUFSIZE]; where LINEBUFSIZE is 8388608  - Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com j...@renewalcomputerservices.com http://RenewalComputerServices.com http://JesusnJim.com (computer repair info, programming) From: David Macek To: mingw-w64-public@lists

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] any reason why stack overflow just calling plain function?

2014-12-15 Thread Jim Michaels
apparently the line is executing, it's hanging somewhere else farther down, but the line isn't displaying (why? do I need to flush iostream?)  - Jim Michaels jmich...@yahoo.com j...@renewalcomputerservices.com http://RenewalComputerServices.com http://JesusnJim.com (computer repair inf

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RFE: New stable release

2014-12-15 Thread Adrien Nader
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 12/15/2014 10:25 AM, Adrien Nader wrote: > > Just to be sure, you mean 4.x and therefore all the other "experimental" > > features? > > Yes, I suspect you would call it 4.x as the 3.x branch would require > substantial > changes. I've mentio

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RFE: New stable release

2014-12-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 12/15/2014 10:25 AM, Adrien Nader wrote: > Just to be sure, you mean 4.x and therefore all the other "experimental" > features? Yes, I suspect you would call it 4.x as the 3.x branch would require substantial changes. --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] RFE: New stable release

2014-12-15 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi, On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > > The current stable release branch is not able to build the wine-gecko project > while the latest git checkout is. There are 5 new files and a dozen headers > with > missing or incorrect definitions that wine-gecko expects. > >

[Mingw-w64-public] RFE: New stable release

2014-12-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Hello, The current stable release branch is not able to build the wine-gecko project while the latest git checkout is. There are 5 new files and a dozen headers with missing or incorrect definitions that wine-gecko expects. When will the next stable branch release be made against what is in gi

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] netioapi.h: Include ws2ipdef.h.

2014-12-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Jacek, On Dec 15 12:06, Jacek Caban wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On 12/15/14 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > On Oct 15 20:57, Kai Tietz wrote: > >> Patch is ok. Please go ahead and apply. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Kai > >> > >> 2014-10-15 20:14 GMT+02:00 Jacek Caban : > >>> For S

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] netioapi.h: Include ws2ipdef.h.

2014-12-15 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Corinna, On 12/15/14 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi guys, > > On Oct 15 20:57, Kai Tietz wrote: >> Patch is ok. Please go ahead and apply. >> >> Thanks, >> Kai >> >> 2014-10-15 20:14 GMT+02:00 Jacek Caban : >>> For SOCKADDR_INET. >>> >>> --- >>> mingw-w64-headers/include/netioapi.h | 1 +

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] netioapi.h: Include ws2ipdef.h.

2014-12-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi guys, On Oct 15 20:57, Kai Tietz wrote: > Patch is ok. Please go ahead and apply. > > Thanks, > Kai > > 2014-10-15 20:14 GMT+02:00 Jacek Caban : > > For SOCKADDR_INET. > > > > --- > > mingw-w64-headers/include/netioapi.h | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) This patch breaks Cygwin ap