On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> 2014-11-07
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>
>> On 11/7/14, Dongs
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2014-11-07 14:45 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song :
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse wrote:
>> > Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
>> >
>>
>> I don't known which is better:-)
>> Here is some stats:
>>
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > If we define _POS
2014-11-07 14:45 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song :
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse wrote:
> > Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
> >
>
> I don't known which is better:-)
> Here is some stats:
>
> $ grep -r "_DEFINED[^A-Z0-9]" . | wc -l
> 26145
>
> $ grep -r "_
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse wrote:
> Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
>
I don't known which is better:-)
Here is some stats:
$ grep -r "_DEFINED[^A-Z0-9]" . | wc -l
26145
$ grep -r "_DECLARED[^A-Z0-9]" . | wc -l
15
---
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>>>
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> Is it correc
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>>
>>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
>>> > Is it correct ?
>>> >
>>> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
>
>> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
>> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
>> > Is it correct ?
>> >
>> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
>> > use _POSIX_
Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2014-11-07
-
发件人:Dongsheng Song
发送日期:2014-11-07 16:01
收件人:mingw64
抄送:
主题:[Mingw-w64-public] [PA
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer :
> On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> > If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> > Is it correct ?
> >
> > PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
> > use _POSIX_ anymore.
> > MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid wit
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
> Is it correct ?
>
> PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
> use _POSIX_ anymore.
> MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__.
I believe (but not necessarily correct ab
Hi,
2014-11-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song :
> OK for apply ?
Patch is ok.
Thanks,
Kai
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://li
Looks good to me. Please apply to trunk.
Regards,
Kai
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/m
OK for apply ?
---
mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h | 3 +++
mingw-w64-headers/crt/unistd.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h
index f43befb..5f635c8 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h
+++ b/mingw-w
15 matches
Mail list logo