On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>>
>> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein :
>>>
>>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
>>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefi
> From: bmburst...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:45:59 +0200
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Project News | New Builds]
>
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> mailto:vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com>> w
2014-11-03 16:45 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein :
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> wrote:
>
>> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein :
>>
>>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
>>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein :
>
>> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
>> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the
>> toolchain, and it failed looking for the pre
2014-11-03 10:30 GMT+01:00 Baruch Burstein :
> I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
> just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the
> toolchain, and it failed looking for the prefixed versions of 'ar' and
> 'windres'. Easily solvable (make a
I am curious why only a few of the executables get prefixed versions? I
just tried running a certain makefile with prefixed versions of the
toolchain, and it failed looking for the prefixed versions of 'ar' and
'windres'. Easily solvable (make a copy and prefix it), but I am still
curious why some
