Re: [Mingw-w64-public] cannot execute binary file: Exec format error

2014-10-25 Thread Ray Donnelly
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Mark Cianfaglione wrote: > Hi > > I'm using MSYS2 and Mingw-w64 on a Windows 7 64 bit system and I've got > a situation where I've compiles a program that uses GTK3 but I get a > "cannot execute binary file: Exec format error" when I try to execute > it. > > I thou

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] netioapi.h inconsistence

2014-10-25 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 10/25/14, Alexey Pavlov wrote: > Hi! > > Some users report about inconsistency in netioapi header. They have > issues with using it on WinXP. See: > > https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/issues/279 > > Regards, > Alexey. Looked at glib-2.42.0 source, its configury has a check for if_name

[Mingw-w64-public] cannot execute binary file: Exec format error

2014-10-25 Thread Mark Cianfaglione
Hi I'm using MSYS2 and Mingw-w64 on a Windows 7 64 bit system and I've got a situation where I've compiles a program that uses GTK3 but I get a "cannot execute binary file: Exec format error" when I try to execute it. I thought perhaps that my makefile was borked so I made a simple "hello world"

[Mingw-w64-public] netioapi.h inconsistence

2014-10-25 Thread Alexey Pavlov
Hi! Some users report about inconsistency in netioapi header. They have issues with using it on WinXP. See: https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/issues/279 Regards, Alexey. -- __

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

2014-10-25 Thread Kai Tietz
2014-10-25 2:53 GMT+02:00 dw : > >> Ups, that was unintended to send an empty mail :) > > I did wonder. I assumed it was just a ping. > >> So, here is a patch. > > Your patch does not look right. You have added the new checks using "||"? Hmm, might be a typo. >> It would be great if somebody co

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Slow pseudo-relocations

2014-10-25 Thread Kai Tietz
So things are clear, dw please apply your patch. It is indeed better to change flags - if possible - just once. Thanks, Kai 2014-10-25 6:01 GMT+02:00 Vadim Chugunov : > I've tried both patches (fixed conditions in Kai's) and both eliminate > extraneous calls to VirtualProtect. However Kai's pat