Dynamic exception specification is deprecated since C++11.
I vote for removing it.
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2014-09-23
-
发件人:G M
发送日期:2014-09-23 12:18
收件人:mingw-w64-public
抄送:
主题:[Mingw-w6
Hi
I've been doing some experiments with clang and mingw.
clang reports the mingw com headers are incorrect.
It says comdef.h at line 164 has this definition.
void _com_issue_error(HRESULT hr) throw(_com_error) {
But comip.h has this definition.
void WINAPI _com_issue_error(HRESULT);
and tha
Am 21.09.2014 um 23:41 schrieb dw:
>
> On 9/20/2014 8:07 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
>> Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz:
>>> 2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw :
For the parts that are "working around a compiler bug":
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
>>>
Thanks,
Kai
2014-09-22 14:51 GMT+02:00 JonY :
> On 9/22/2014 19:04, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hi JonY,
>>
>> the patch you sent is ok for none-C++ case. For C++-case old code can
>> stay as is. Please see other places in our headers where we have
>> C++/C special-casing for unnamed types.
>>
>
> Done,
On 9/22/2014 19:04, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi JonY,
>
> the patch you sent is ok for none-C++ case. For C++-case old code can
> stay as is. Please see other places in our headers where we have
> C++/C special-casing for unnamed types.
>
Done, added C version, C++ version retained.
signature.a
Hi JonY,
the patch you sent is ok for none-C++ case. For C++-case old code can
stay as is. Please see other places in our headers where we have
C++/C special-casing for unnamed types.
Kai
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance
On 9/22/2014 15:12, Kai Tietz wrote:
> No that patch isn't ok.
>
> We need to make difference here for C++ and C case. Your change
> doesn't fix anything, it breaks things.
>
> For C case the structure needs to be inlined into it. The syntax of
> an unnamed member in a structure doesn't work re
No that patch isn't ok.
We need to make difference here for C++ and C case. Your change
doesn't fix anything, it breaks things.
For C case the structure needs to be inlined into it. The syntax of
an unnamed member in a structure doesn't work reliable for gcc.
Kai
-