Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ICE with 4.9 on simple code (regression)

2014-07-17 Thread lh_mouse
I tested it just now and it crashed again. However it seems that this ICE happens on Windows only. Anyway I have filed a report and if you are interested you can add yourself in the cc list. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61838 -- Best

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ICE with 4.9 on simple code (regression)

2014-07-17 Thread Óscar Fuentes
"lh_mouse" writes: > Tip: when preparing a test case it is recommended to remove dependency > on library headers since gcc and gcc libraries(here, libstdc++) are > developed by different teams, and otherwise people might not be able > to tell who went wrong. An ICE is always a compiler bug. ---

[Mingw-w64-public] gcc sanitizers

2014-07-17 Thread mity
Hi, I tried to use gcc 4.9.0 with -fsanitize=address or -fsantize=undefined. However linker then failed, as the options imply -lasan or -lubsan respectivelly. Are these supposed to work in mingw-w64? If not, then perhaps the options should fail early and tell they are not supported rather then le

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ICE with 4.9 on simple code (regression)

2014-07-17 Thread niXman
lh_mouse 2014-07-17 13:51: > This seems to be a g++ bug. SInce g++ 4.9.1 has been released now I > think we could wait a few days Yes, tomorrow I upload this builds. -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ICE with 4.9 on simple code (regression)

2014-07-17 Thread lh_mouse
This seems to be a g++ bug. SInce g++ 4.9.1 has been released now I think we could wait a few days and see whether it happens on g++ 4.9.1 and if so, file a bug report to gcc developers. Tip: when preparing a test case it is recommended to remove dependency on library headers since gcc and gcc

[Mingw-w64-public] ICE with 4.9 on simple code (regression)

2014-07-17 Thread Renaud Lepère
I have installed a new version of mingw64 x86_64-4.9.0-posix-seh-rt_v3-rev2from Mingw-builds project But when I compile the code, i got an ICE. I am not sure where is the bug (gcc ?). I also tried the same code on http://gcc.godbolt.org/ with a 4.9.0 compiler but it was ok. The code is very sim