On 6/20/2014 10:00 PM, JonY wrote:
> I don't know what you mean by config files, but yes, each toolchain
> install is independent from each other. It is best not to mix them.
>
By config files, only that some command line programs like GCC you can
specity with a command line argument that it
On 6/20/2014 20:16, Peter Kennard wrote:
>
> So I assume from your answer the *only* difference in the two installs
> is the host machine the tools run on, Meaning all sets of static libs
> and the other resources the compiler and other tools need to build all
> targets specified by the command li
For the release package
"x64-Qt-5.2.1+QtCreator-3.0.1-(gcc-4.8.2-seh).7z" that I've picked up
from
"http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/files/external-binary-packages/Qt-Builds/";,
is there an easy way to get the "Welcome" section populated? For the 32
bit edition from Qt-Project, th
> > I suggest the following formula for calculating sine at (0, pi/2)
> > interval:
> >
> > sin(x) = (0.6736*x - 0.09779183*x^2 - 0.12839086*x^3 +
> > 0.01826627*x^4) / (1 - 0.09809942*x + 0.03936879*x^2)
> >
> could you please attach some R code for this?
> My plan for now is to make those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.06.2014 22:36, schrieb Pavel:
> Hi André,
Hi, wow, thanks for having such a close look.
> I have some comments to the sinf implementation. First of all,
> calculating the factorials in separate function is quite inefficient,
> since you repeat
Ok thanks, so the below is really not a fully correct assumption.
> So I assume from your answer the *only* difference in the two installs
> is the host machine the tools run on, Meaning all sets of static libs
> and the other resources the compiler and other tools need to build all
> targets s
Thanks for noticing - I actually waited until I got the notification
that registration was successful after replying to the verification
message - mabe a few minutes later.
So I assume from your answer the *only* difference in the two installs
is the host machine the tools run on, Meaning all
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kennard [mailto:pet...@livingwork.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:19 AM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] To 32 or 64, that is the question :)
>
> as the unified installer has options for 64 and 32 bit install
Hello,
I deleted that mail on moderation by accident. That can happen
again, if you don't subscribe to the mailing-list before posting to
it. I try to moderate best I can, nevertheless sometimes it is hard
to decide
Regards,
Kai
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Subject:
On 6/20/2014 08:18, Peter Kennard wrote:
> as the unified installer has options for 64 and 32 bit installs.
>
> I assume the 64 bit install will not run on a 32 bit machine or a 32 bit
> OS install.
>
> Does which install is chosen ONLY effect the actual running of the tools
> themselves on the
10 matches
Mail list logo
