On 5/5/2014 04:27, Adrien Nader wrote:
> tl:dr; agreed
>
> Also, something not mentioned elsewhere and which I didn't know where to
> put: a large appeal of git in mingw-w64 is coherency with other source
> repositories. One less tool to master.
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2014, NightStrike wrote:
>> Res
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014, G M wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> I can't build the popular build program ninja with clang++ and mingw.
>
> The reason is demonstrated by this simple program:
>
> // wcx.cpp
>
> #include
> using namespace std;
> #include
> int main()
> {
> wchar_t* p = wcschr(L"hello
tl:dr; agreed
Also, something not mentioned elsewhere and which I didn't know where to
put: a large appeal of git in mingw-w64 is coherency with other source
repositories. One less tool to master.
On Sun, May 04, 2014, NightStrike wrote:
> Responding to both of you inline... sort it out :P
> >> a
Responding to both of you inline... sort it out :P
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Adrien Nader wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014, JonY wrote:
>> On 5/4/2014 12:17, NightStrike wrote:
>> >
>> > Now... that said, there's a few things that I didn't see addressed
>> > anywhere in this thread.
>> >
>> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04.05.2014 19:50, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:09 PM, JonY wrote:
>> On 5/4/2014 12:17, NightStrike wrote:
>>>
>>> Now... that said, there's a few things that I didn't see addressed
>>> anywhere in this thread.
>>>
>>> 1) Jon
Am 02.05.2014 13:02, schrieb JonY:
> Calling all regular mingw-w64 users, for the benefit of all, let's run a
> poll on user opinions on the move.
>
> In order to qualify to vote, please state how you are using mingw-w64
> and how this change may affect you (what's your stake in it?). You may
> di
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:09 PM, JonY wrote:
> On 5/4/2014 12:17, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>> Now... that said, there's a few things that I didn't see addressed
>> anywhere in this thread.
>>
>> 1) Jon, you had asked me to setup a mailing list for svn commits. I
>> did so. Then SF added their own t
On Sun, May 04, 2014, JonY wrote:
> On 5/4/2014 12:17, NightStrike wrote:
> >
> > Now... that said, there's a few things that I didn't see addressed
> > anywhere in this thread.
> >
> > 1) Jon, you had asked me to setup a mailing list for svn commits. I
> > did so. Then SF added their own thing
On 5/4/2014 12:17, NightStrike wrote:
>
> Now... that said, there's a few things that I didn't see addressed
> anywhere in this thread.
>
> 1) Jon, you had asked me to setup a mailing list for svn commits. I
> did so. Then SF added their own thing that just sends the commit
> message without th
